I agree I think there were ancient civilizations that were a lot more advanced than we were told,or at least think.When you consider the great pyramid apparently took about 20 years to build.It`s been calculated they would have had to cut and lay 1 stone every 2 minutes or something like that!? Also again,slaves were not used apparently.But even the pyramids are dwarfed in comparison to the temple complex at Baalbek.Those stones are truly titanic in size and weight..I`ve read stuff about there being a "lost civilization" beneath the south pole..It`s not out of the question.It wasn`t always a frozen wasteland.Before the pole shift (if it happened?) that continent was much warmer and more temperate...There are "out there" theories like ancient peoples went to the moon,not something I`m a believer in.That`s going a tad too far.But there are many,many mysteries involving ancient civilizations...

Hello there Kandace :) First of all I think the Brits who voted for Brexit (me being one) are going to be screwed over by the vermin in power.The trouble with British politics is the 3 main parties (although the liberals are pointless) ALL want to stay in the EU,so there`s no one to defend the brexiteers.It`s betrayal on a massive scale by scumbags only interested in feathering their own nests..May is a disgrace,most of the tories are a joke.Labour are just lefty,traitorous shit and the liberals are as much use as wings on a tent..So the filthy EU will get its own way I can guarantee it...This is the same EU who thinks flooding Europe with the 3rd world is a good thing..I have 1 word for that,Sweden.

Hello dear Kandace. I wish you a happy weekend. Love and hugs ~ Hubert ♫ ♥

Hello my friend. Well, I'm just going to invite a mate of mine over tomorrow for a few beers and watch a few films. Nothing huge really. What are your plans? Anything special? It's pretty late here, 1.30 am, I gotta regulate my sleeping pattern so I can't hang around unfortunately, even though you know I enjoy talking to you very much. I will of course reply tomorrow to any comments that you leave me. Have a great evening my dear. ;) xoxox

That's good and you're welcome. I don't use Google Chrome, but I use Firefox though and okay. Cool that you're getting a few thousand . :) I'm sorry for not replying late last night, I fell asleep and I just got on here and added a new video on here. :) I hope you have a good day at work, and remember, try not to work too hard. :)

Hey Kandace! lol still seeing me as your musical guru I see. All good though;) I read a bit from Mark under here, and yeah that is also a way to comment.I like reading it. And I do have an opinion, bout Trump Obama, Brexit, and white or brown bread. lol strong ones even. But you just end up by outsmarting the other, you won't change an opinion, I found that out long ago on these social sites, and end up being angered blocked and trolled duplicated. haha but even music isn't a " safe " subject. Like what you said about Lindsey and Fleetwood Mac. ( oh he had open heart surgery btw not a heart attack) you say the main draw for you is Stevie, for me it's Lindsey. He was the ( mad ) musical genius from FM. After " rumours" they made a double album Tusk, it sounded like a different band. he got total freedom from the others cause they feared losing him to a solo career. their best album, but not commercial. But it inspired many young upcoming bands. Music depends on what tickles your ear ,and Stevie wrote classic songs too.

If so, would that make us the very creators we have sought to commune with throughout the history of our species? By praying to a higher power, are we in fact talking to ourselves? All just food for thought, but certainly worth pondering. By having this very conversation, are we (as the universe) two different threads of thought bouncing off or merging with one another, as the great cosmic algorithm explores all possible variables on the origin of itself? In the process of doing so, it is actually creating the blueprint for it's own creation? "I think therefore I am". It's possible that Descartes was onto something with that train of thought, something more profound than he could have ever realized, living in the 17th century. But I still feel the need to assert the question, how could he know for sure that he thinks? Yes animals think, but on a far more rudimentary level than people. So how can we know for certain how aware we truly are, if we only have our own level of consciousness as a measure? Measured as it is, against how aware lower forms of life are, on our own planet. If a Neanderthal were to say, "I think therefore I am", I might laugh. Just as Descartes couldn't possibly have been as self aware as you or I, with what we know living in the 21st century.

When the tree falls, sound waves are generated, regardless of whether or not there is anything or anyone to hear it. But what IS sound if it is not perceived? The same could also be said of reality as a whole, so your "tree" analogy/question is of course apt. Perhaps reality exists in some form of nullified or neutral state, a kind of soup of particles or energy given no form or coherence until such a time as they are observed or perceived. A kind of cosmic clay if you will, shaped and sculpted by our own minds, even perhaps our own expectations. When peering back toward the beginning of the universe, astronomers are looking back through time, as the star light they observe takes tens of billion of years to reach us. As you say, it has been proven that reality on a sub atomic level is shaped by our observation of it. So then, if we observe the distant past, are we too shaping the distant past through the act of observation? Is this perhaps how consciousness can precede creation? Conscious gives rise to creation through the act of observing the moment of creation, then billions of years later, creation gives rise to consciousness in a beautifully elegant infinity loop.

As an atheist, any speculation that I could offer on such matters, would be just that, pure speculation. Atheists are free to speculate, but by definition, cannot BELIEVE in anything. Only know that which is there to be known, whatever it may be. Hence, we are open to all manner of possibilities, so long as they remain speculation, and do not become belief. For if they do, then we cease to be atheists. You might describe atheism as a kind of "bloody minded rationalism". I'll speculate on anything, believe in nothing and know as much as I can. Belief in anything, like all ideas, mimics living things. In that, ideas and beliefs both propagate themselves and evolve, adapt and change outright over time. As such, one could almost go so far as to say that thought itself is organic. Perhaps each and every one of us, (our lives) are a thread of thought, or idea concocted by the universe as it ponders itself. One idea or thought, leading inexorably into the next, as we ourselves propagate. What conclusions shall the universe come to about itself, is anyone's guess. But perhaps, just perhaps...we are all collectively (and by all, I mean all living things throughout the universe) headed toward some grand comprehensive, overarching realization about ourself. Notice that I said "ourself" rather than "ourselves", as collectively, all living things in the cosmos are one universal consciousness.

Oh not true. Atheism is merely a default, neutral position of not believing in that which cannot be verified. It is not an assertion on the lack of any metaphysical reality. As an atheist, I know as much as I can know, up to this point in human understanding, and refuse to believe in that which cannot be known, or is not known to be true.